Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 11:52

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

Have the ability to visualize:

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

What is the difference between 'Adidas' and 'Adizero' shoes in terms of running distance and quality?

PC: Google

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

What are some signs that someone may be being stalked by an organization or secret society? How can they find out for sure?

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

Actually have some literary skill:

Because reading is WORK. Period.

Mariska Hargitay Was Accidentally Left Behind at the Scene of the Car Wreck That Killed Her Mom Jayne Mansfield - People.com

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Texas, Oklahoma and Nevada make changes to lure business amid Delaware’s ‘Dexit’ concern - AP News

PC: Google

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Are Plastic Cutting Boards Safe? We Asked Experts - NBC News

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

PC: Google

Powerful solar telescope unveils ultra-fine magnetic 'curtains' on the sun's surface - Space

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

Temu’s daily US users cut in half following end of ‘de minimis’ loophole - New York Post

Many if not most, are in this category.

Netflix and chill is a thing:

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

What are you wearing under your clothes today?

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Swap Out The Dated Eucalyptus Decor Trend For This More Modern Option - House Digest

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to:

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Do all you people that took the "jab" feel lied to yet?

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

PC: The Guardian

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

PC: Google

There are some books that just…suck!

Entertainment.

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

PC: Google…my precious!

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).